Book 10: The Behaviour of Moths
This is a first novel from Poppy Adams, and begins with Ginny awaiting the arrival of her sister Vivi, who she has not seen for over forty years. Ginny lives a rundown mansion, an old family home desperately in need of repair. She does not go out, having her groceries delivered and fighting off the woman from social services. Ginny comes from a family of lepidopterists (people who study moths), and claims to be well known in those circles, having published great findings and research. Once Vivi arrives, we discover more about their childhoods, family, and their relationship with each other. The story roams around in time, flashing back to significant events — Vivi falling off a tower and being unable to have children; being expelled from school; their mother’s battle with alcoholism — but also focusing on the two as adults who don’t really know each other.
This wasn’t an enjoyable read for me. I didn’t want to pick it back up, it was quite a chore. And it’s not like it’s a particularly long book, or difficult. I just wasn’t that interested. I couldn’t really engage with any of the characters, possibly because I couldn’t know for sure if anything I was being told was true, and so how do you feel sympathy for someone who may be making everything up? And there was far too much information about moths for my liking. It seemed Ginny used them as an escape from the real world, when she didn’t want to deal with what was going on, so it was another way of keeping us in the dark. It was also very heavy handed. I wasn’t here for a lecture on moths, or a how-to on studying them. I admit to skipping big chunks of it, just to get back to the plot, such as it was.
Ginny is the textbook definition of an unreliable narrator. It’s implied from the beginning that she sees events in a very different way to everyone else, and so her version is not to be trusted. We can glean little bits of truth from conversations with others that she recounts, but over all we can never fully believe what we’re being told. This would be fine, and an interesting way of making us read between the lines, if it weren’t for the ending. We are told nothing. I’m not someone who always needs everything spelled out for me in books, sometimes the best stories are those with ambiguous endings, because it works for that particular tale. But it doesn’t work here. I don’t think you can imply throughout a novel that there are huge secrets within a family, and about a main character, that will change your entire view of the situation and then, well, not disclose those secrets. It’s frustrating as all hell. I don’t want to try and piece it together myself, as I am left to do. I want some sort of resolution. Otherwise it feels like I went through all that for nothing.




